2. Home
  4. Docs
  6. Research
  8. Technical

Technical

Bollinger Bands

Supporting:

  • Using Bollinger Bands and Stochastic Oscillators as a Trading Strategy for Large Cap Stocks by Ryan Maxum (2016): This paper examines the use of Bollinger Bands in combination with Stochastic Oscillators as a trading strategy for large-cap U.S. stocks from 2012 to 2014. The study demonstrates that using these two momentum indicators together can enhance trading performance by identifying optimal entry and exit points, thereby reducing market exposure while aiming for returns above the market average. The research includes transaction costs, providing a realistic evaluation of the strategy’s effectiveness.
  • Scaling and Predictability in Stock Markets: A Comparative Study by Various (PLOS ONE) (2014): This study analyzes the predictability of stock markets, including the S&P 500, using various technical indicators, including Bollinger Bands. The paper highlights that Bollinger Bands can be effective in identifying profitable trading opportunities, particularly when combined with other indicators to optimize trading strategies. The research does not explicitly focus on transaction costs but provides a comprehensive analysis of the indicators’ predictive power in different market conditions.

Criticizing:

  • Popularity vs. Profitability of Bollinger Bands by Harry Scheule (2020): This study analyzes the profitability of Bollinger Bands, finding that their performance often falls short of expectations. Despite their popularity, the results indicate that Bollinger Bands do not consistently generate superior returns, especially after accounting for transaction costs. The research suggests that simpler strategies may often be more effective.

Chande Momentum Oscillator

Supporting:

  • None currently available.

Criticizing:

  • None currently available.

Exponential Moving Average (EMA)

Supporting:

Criticizing:

  • Performance of Moving Average Trading Strategies Over Varying Stock Market Conditions: The Finnish Evidence by Eero Pätäri & Mika Vilska (2014): This paper analyzes the effectiveness of various moving average trading strategies, including the Exponential Moving Average (EMA), across different market conditions in Finland. The study found that EMA-based strategies were particularly effective during trending markets, offering timely entry and exit signals due to EMA’s responsiveness to price changes. However, the performance of EMA diminished in volatile or sideways markets, where it often generated false signals. The authors critically highlight that while EMA can be a powerful tool, its effectiveness is highly contingent on the prevailing market conditions, and traders should consider combining it with other indicators to improve reliability.

MACD

Supporting:

  • Revisiting the Performance of MACD and RSI Oscillators by Terence Tai-Leung Chong, Wing-Kam Ng, and Venus Khim-Sen Liew (2014): This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) in generating profitable trading signals across various stock indices. The study finds that MACD, particularly when adjusted for different market conditions, can outperform simple buy-and-hold strategies. However, the results also suggest that the performance of MACD is sensitive to parameter settings and may not consistently generate excess returns across all markets.

Criticizing:

  • A Comparative Study of the MACD-Based Trading Strategies: Evidence from the US Stock Market by Pat Tong Chio (2022): This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the MACD indicator across various trading strategies applied to major US indices like the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500. The study finds that while the MACD alone generates a win rate below 50%, its performance improves when combined with other indicators. However, the study suggests that the MACD may not be reliable as a standalone indicator.

Money Flow Index (MFI)

Supporting:

  • Optimization and Testing of Money Flow Index by Patrice Marek, Věra Marková (2020): This paper explores the effectiveness of the Money Flow Index (MFI) as a trading tool, specifically focusing on its application to the S&P 500. The authors investigate whether the commonly recommended MFI parameters are optimal or if adjustments can enhance performance. Through simulations on the largest companies in the S&P 500, the study finds that MFI-based trading strategies can outperform the traditional buy-and-hold approach. However, the research emphasizes the need for parameter optimization, as the standard settings often cited in literature may not yield the best results.

Criticizing:

  • A Comparative Study of the MACD-Based Trading Strategies: Evidence from the US Stock Market by Pat Tong Chio (2022): Although this paper primarily focuses on the MACD indicator, it also touches on the Money Flow Index (MFI) as a supplementary tool. The study highlights how combining MFI with MACD can improve the accuracy of trading signals, particularly in detecting market reversals. However, it also points out the challenges of relying solely on MFI, emphasizing the importance of using it in conjunction with other indicators for more reliable results.

On-Balance Volume

Supporting:

  • Profitability of the On-Balance Volume Indicator by William Wai Him Tsang, Terence Tai Leung Chong (2009): This paper evaluates the profitability of the On-Balance Volume (OBV) trading rule, focusing on its application in the stock markets of Greater China. The study finds that the OBV indicator has become increasingly profitable, delivering notable returns to investors who utilize it in their trading strategies. Despite the general lack of empirical studies on volume-based indicators, this research provides evidence that OBV can be an effective tool in predicting market movements and generating profits.

Criticizing:

  • Prediction of Closing Stock Prices by Garth Garner (2004): This paper explores the effectiveness of combining five different stock analysis methods to predict the next day’s closing stock prices. The methods used include On-Balance Volume (OBV), Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO), Relative Strength Index (RSI), Stochastic (%K), and Moving Average (MA). OBV, in particular, is used to assess buying and selling pressure by analyzing the relationship between today’s and yesterday’s closing prices. The study found that when all five indicators aligned, the prediction of stock price movement was more accurate than random chance, demonstrating the potential of these indicators in a combined strategy. However, it also highlights the variability in prediction accuracy across different stocks, suggesting the need for further refinement of the algorithm.

Relative Strength Index (RSI)

Supporting:

  • Revisiting the Performance of MACD and RSI Oscillators by Terence Tai-Leung Chong, Wing-Kam Ng, and Venus Khim-Sen Liew (2014): This paper examines the historical performance of the RSI indicator across various developed markets. It found that the RSI(21,50) rule generated significant abnormal returns in the Milan Comit General and the S&P/TSX Composite Index, while the RSI(14,30/70) rule was profitable in the Dow Jones Industrials Index. The study does not explicitly mention transaction costs.

Criticizing:

  • A Comparative Study on Effectiveness of Volume-Based RSI vs Traditional RSI by Various Authors (2021): This study critically examines the traditional RSI by comparing it with a volume-based RSI. It concludes that the traditional RSI’s performance can be inconsistent, particularly in volatile markets without significant volume changes. The study does not explicitly detail transaction costs but suggests that RSI’s effectiveness is limited.

Simple Moving Average (SMA)

Supporting:

  • Validity of Technical Analysis Indicators: A Case of KSE-100 Index by Qamar Abbas (2017): This study evaluates the effectiveness of various technical analysis indicators, including the Simple Moving Average (SMA), in predicting the movements of the KSE-100 Index. The research finds that while SMA can provide useful signals in trend identification, its reliability is diminished in highly volatile markets. The study also emphasizes that SMA should be used in combination with other indicators to enhance predictive accuracy and reduce the likelihood of false signals.

Criticizing:

  • Performance Analysis of Conventional Moving Average Methods in Forex Forecasting by Seng Hansun, Marcel Bonar Kristanda (2017): This paper evaluates the effectiveness of several moving average methods, including the Simple Moving Average (SMA), in forecasting Forex data. The study compares SMA with Weighted Moving Average (WMA) and Exponential Moving Average (EMA) using three major currency pairs: EUR/USD, AUD/USD, and GBP/USD. While SMA is widely known for its simplicity and ease of use, the results show that it underperforms compared to EMA and WMA. SMA recorded higher forecast error measurements, including Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE), indicating that while it remains a basic tool for trend analysis, it may not be the most accurate for predicting Forex market movements in this context.

Stochastics

Supporting:

  • Algorithm-Based Low-Frequency Trading Using a Stochastic Oscillator and William%R: A Case Study on the U.S. and Korean Indices by Chan Kyu Paik, Jinhee Choi, Ivan Ureta Vaquero (2024): This study explores the use of a stochastic oscillator combined with William%R in a low-frequency trading algorithm. The research focuses on applying this methodology to the S&P 500 and MSCI Korea indices over a 12-year period. The findings indicate that the algorithm outperforms the benchmark indices, achieving a high hit ratio and minimizing drawdowns. The study demonstrates how these oscillators can be effectively used by small investors and institutional investors to implement market timing strategies with fewer trades and lower risks.

Criticizing:

  • The Profitability of Technical Analysis: A Review by Cheol-Ho Park and Scott H. Irwin (2004): This report reviews the effectiveness of technical analysis, including stochastic oscillators, in predicting market movements. While stochastics have shown some success in futures and foreign exchange markets, their performance in stock markets is inconsistent. The study finds mixed results across different markets, with concerns about biases in empirical testing, leading to varied conclusions about the reliability of stochastics as a trading tool.

Williams %R

Supporting:

  • Algorithm-Based Low-Frequency Trading Using a Stochastic Oscillator and William %R: A Case Study on the U.S. and Korean Indices by Chan Kyu Paik, Jinhee Choi, Ivan Ureta Vaquero (2024): This paper explores the use of the William %R indicator in conjunction with a stochastic oscillator for low-frequency trading strategies applied to the S&P 500 and MSCI Korea indices. The William %R indicator, known for identifying overbought and oversold conditions, is effectively used to fine-tune entry and exit points in the trading algorithm. The study highlights that incorporating William %R improves the algorithm’s performance, particularly in timing trades during market extremes, thereby reducing risk and enhancing returns.

Criticizing:

  • A Comparative Study of Technical Indicator Performances by Stock Sector: RSI, MACD, and Larry Williams %R Applied to the Information Technology, Utilities, and Consumer Staples Sectors by Claudius Sundlöf, Gustav Krantz (2016): The thesis critically examines the performance of Williams %R across different stock sectors, including Information Technology, Utilities, and Consumer Staples. The study found that while Williams %R was consistent in its application, it lacked the ability to adapt to sector-specific dynamics, which limited its effectiveness compared to other indicators like RSI and MACD. The authors highlighted that Williams %R often produced false signals, particularly in trending markets, where its overbought and oversold signals were less reliable. This critical view suggests that while Williams %R can be useful, it may not be the best choice for traders seeking sector-specific strategies or in markets with strong trends.

How can we help?